Drift protocol (DRIFT)

$0.04380  +11.17%  24H

Soziale-Stimmungs-Index (SSI)

Marktimpuls-Ranking (MPR)

Beiträge auf X

  • Mike S Founder Trader A
     50.06K  @Mikesi30

    $285M gone from @DriftProtocol in 12 minutes. I don't keep much on DeFi protocols for this reason - protocol risk is real and most people don't price it properly. Which is a shame, because the yield gap is genuinely interesting. DeFi strategies offering 5-10% on stablecoins while the average savings account sits around 3%. That delta exists and most people can't access it because everything around it feels too risky or too complicated. The product that bridges this still feels half-built. A crypto neobank where you deposit, earn yield, and funds are protected up to a certain amount - everything else abstracted away. Curious what the best attempt looks like so far.

     8  5  328
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift Protocol资金流失2.85亿,作者强调DeFi风险,寻求更安全方案。
  • DeFi Warhol FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     41.46K  @Defi_Warhol
    DeFi Warhol FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     41.46K  @Defi_Warhol

    I went through Drift’s incident thread, and this is the clearest play by play of what happened to @DriftProtocol ↓ March 23 The setup appears to have started here. Drift says 4 durable nonce accounts were created. That suggests parts of the attack were prepared in advance. Drift’s implication → At least 2 of 5 signer approvals were already tied to the setup March 27 Drift says the Security Council multisig was updated because one council member was replaced. It did not explain why. But the change did not fully remove the attacker’s path. March 30 A new durable nonce account was created for someone in the updated multisig. That suggests the attacker still had effective access to 2 of the 5 required signers. April 1 Drift spotted unusual activity. Users were told not to deposit. Deposits and withdrawals were suspended shortly after. Later that day, Drift says there was a legitimate-looking test withdrawal from the insurance fund. About a minute later, 2 pre-signed durable nonce transactions were ex

     56  8  4.49K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift suffered an attack, its multisig was exploited, and asset security needs vigilance.
  • 吴说区块链 Media Educator D
     174.80K  @wublockchain12

    Wu reports that according to Onchain Lens monitoring, since the recent hacker attack, a wallet address associated with the Drift Protocol team has deposited 56.25 million DRIFT into Bybit and Gate exchanges, worth about $2.44 million. https://t.co/kYweBc7VWi

     2  1  2.81K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    After the hack, a large amount of DRIFT flowed into exchanges, potentially triggering sell‑offs
  • 吴说区块链 Media Educator D
     174.80K  @wublockchain12

    Wu said he learned, according to Ember monitoring, that after the $285 million theft at Drift Protocol, FTX/Alameda sold 6.94 million DRIFT (about $320,000) via Wintermute a few hours ago. Alameda was an investor in the protocol; the 8.33 million tokens it unlocked a year ago were once valued at $6.22 million, but have now shrunk dramatically to $380,000. DRIFT is the governance token of a Solana‑ecosystem derivatives DEX. https://t.co/ylhCTJ37PN

     2  3  2.17K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    DRIFT dropped to $380,000 after the theft, and Alameda hastily sold 6.94 million tokens.
  • 吴说区块链 Media Educator D
     174.80K  @wublockchain12

    Wu said he learned, according to Ash monitoring, that after the $285 million theft in the Drift Protocol, FTX/Alameda sold 6.94 million DRIFT (about $320,000) through Wintermute a few hours ago. Alameda was an investor in the protocol; the 8.33 million tokens it unlocked a year ago were once worth $6.22 million, now severely diluted to $380,000. DRIFT is the governance token of the Solana ecosystem derivatives DEX. https://t.co/ylhCTJ37PN

     0  0  16
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    DRIFT fell to $38 in value after a $285 million theft, Alameda sold 6.94 million
  • fomo 🧠 OnChain_Analyst Trader C
     93.19K  @fomomofosol

    are we back?? https://t.co/kage8inHBZ

    gr3g D
     45.78K  @gr3gor14n

    drift protocol gets wiped for a quarter of a billion and a day later Toly is shilling Bernie Senders coin https://t.co/V60cYXjxTg

     77  10  7.42K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Neutral
    DRIFT被清算,Ber币被推介,行情尚不明朗
  • Zach Humphries TA_Analyst Trader B
     136.78K  @ZachHumphries

    The $DRIFT exploit is a grim reminder that no TVL is ever 100% safe. Seeing over $270M leave the treasuries in under an hour is pure madness. The $DRIFT token is already nuking and liquidity is drying up fast. This looks like a classic admin key compromise rather than a code bug. Are we seeing a rotation out of $SOL ecosystem coins because of this?

     10  3  981
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Extrem bärisch
    Drift protocol suffered a $270 million vulnerability attack, causing the DRIFT token to plunge and raising concerns about the SOL ecosystem.
  • Crypto En Afrique FA_Analyst Educator B
     4.10K  @CryptoEnAfrique

    Imagine having your project and getting hacked for over $100M on April 1st. You try to inform your community about the situation and the actions to take. They read it and think it's an April Fool's joke 😹. That's what happened to the Drift protocol on Solana.

    Drift D
     132.57K  @DriftProtocol

    Drift Protocol is experiencing an active attack. Deposits and withdrawals have been suspended. We are coordinating with multiple security firms, bridges, and exchanges to contain the incident. This is not an April Fools joke. We’ll provide additional updates from this account as more information is available to share.

     12  5  419
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift protocol on Solana is under attack, deposits and withdrawals halted, risk is extremely high
  • DeFi Warhol FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     41.46K  @Defi_Warhol

    I went through Drift’s incident thread, and this is the clearest play by play of what happened to @DriftProtocol ↓ March 23 The setup appears to have started here. Drift says 4 durable nonce accounts were created. That suggests parts of the attack were prepared in advance. Drift’s implication → At least 2 of 5 signer approvals were already tied to the setup March 27 Drift says the Security Council multisig was updated because one council member was replaced. It did not explain why. But the change did not fully remove the attacker’s path. March 30 A new durable nonce account was created for someone in the updated multisig. That suggests the attacker still had effective access to 2 of the 5 required signers. April 1 Drift spotted unusual activity. Users were told not to deposit. Deposits and withdrawals were suspended shortly after. Later that day, Drift says there was a legitimate-looking test withdrawal from the insurance fund. About a minute later, 2 pre-signed durable nonce transactions were ex

     56  8  4.49K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift suffered an attack, its multisig was exploited, and asset security needs vigilance.
  • Emperor Osmo 🐂 🎯 FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     92.28K  @Flowslikeosmo

    More crazy to watch $DRIFT price to TVL over the past year. Signs were there. https://t.co/DIA7HrMSti https://t.co/aeMQfN1Hza

    aaalex.hl D
     16.82K  @aaalexhl

    Kinda crazy to see 50% of TVL just wiped out in 2 days https://t.co/S0sq5HDmqp https://t.co/CRg1mfm56r

     9  4  1.92K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Extrem bärisch
    DRIFT's TVL plummeted 50% within two days, and the token price and TVL chart show a long‑term downtrend.