CRCL (CRCL)

#Circle #CRCL #USDC Nowadays, a huge number of KOL bloggers indiscriminately bearish on CRCL—why do they always put the profit of stablecoin companies first? What is a stablecoin? What is redemption right? Why buy U.S. Treasury bonds? I think these so‑called big V’s are just talking nonsense. 1. The core purpose of a stablecoin is to keep fiat exchange rates stable; the issuer holds an appropriate reserve to redeem, avoiding redemption difficulties and exchange‑rate drops. Moreover, under current regulation, stablecoins must be compliant and focus on exchange‑rate stability—anything else is baseless. 2. Why buy U.S. Treasury bonds? Stablecoin firms aren’t looking to invest in high‑risk, high‑return projects for profit. A stablecoin equals fiat; it needs a company that can provide you with an equivalent exchange rate redemption, not a firm that boasts huge profits. In other words, look around the world for the most stable returns that can be redeemed at parity—what else besides U.S. Treasuries? All countries’ foreign‑exchange reserves rely on buying U.S. Treasuries to stay below inflation risk; would you rather buy yen or some other currency? Furthermore, if CRCL were to invest all funds in gold, oil, or other hedging/arbitrage products, would you still trust USDC? Thus, I believe CRCL’s model—financing, buying U.S. Treasuries, issuing USDC—is extremely safe and shows responsibility to users and the ecosystem! That is its purpose, while some bloggers maliciously distort and spread rumors! @circle

$CRCL and the idea of using technicals + fundamental + sentiment factors together ✍️ I had been considering entry into Circle for months. But as usual, used chart levels to set my ideal entry zone. I decided, "~$64 is my buy level, if that never hits, I will let it go". Which is typical framework for me. But something I am always stressing: - not all dips are created equal. Not all pumps are created equal. - technical levels have to be matched to the fundamental story behind them - is my profit target hitting on a new catalyst? Maybe I'll keep holding - my profit target hitting on pure hype? time to sell! *this works in reverse too* Technical targets are far less valuable without understanding the fundamental / sentiment context behind the moves. Circle has now hit the price level I wanted to see. But my suspicion is the move is justified, so I did not pull the trigger. I still think Circle can be a successful business. But the long-term multibag thesis was that Circle's $USDC would become key part of t

Capitulation day on Circle $CRCL with Visa / Stripe / Mastercard launching their own stablecoin. Perfect announcement when from a TA perspective we now have: - gap closed from initial impulse move - selling on declining volume = signs of exhaustion - Inverted hammer at the end of a corrective pattern - sentiment in the gutter I like the setup here @AlemzadehC @TheProfInvestor @cantonmeow @Freedom_By_40

Bernstein confirms outperformance on $CRCL with a target of 190$.

🧐What is Circle falling off? Is its moat still there? First the result: I think $CRCL is oversold in the short term, and if market sentiment continues to push it lower I would consider buying a portion, But whether it can be held long‑term, I don’t have the confidence I once had and may need more observation. Because fundamentals and moat have clearly undergone huge changes, which are exactly the things I write about below! I’ve been researching a question for a while: What truly constitutes a company’s moat? Today the stablecoin track Open Standard announced Open USD, a new stablecoin backed by over 140 firms including Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock and Coinbase. Investors are evaluating the competitive threat it may pose to USDC. The real‑world plunge it caused is a thought‑provoking moat discussion! 1️⃣ What exactly is $CRCL’s decline about? Open Standard also says Open USD is designed so that: Enterprises can mint/redeem at zero cost with no human‑scale limits; partners capture reserve‑asset yield of Open USD after a small management fee; governance is jointly decided by independent Open Standard and partner board. The participant list includes Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Google, Shopify, Coinbase, Solana, Base, Ripple and many other payment, finance, tech and crypto‑infrastructure firms; Stripe publicly said Open USD will be the default stablecoin for its commercial users; The point is clear: Open USD isn’t trying to beat USDC on tech specs, but on distribution mechanics. Circle’s core profit pool comes from reserve‑asset yield; Open USD’s slogan is to return more of that yield to traffic‑bringing partners. In other words, OUSD intends to share the economic benefit that Circle previously kept with Visa, Stripe, Shopify, Coinbase, banks, wallets, exchanges and merchant ecosystems to quickly gain users. The "USD 1:1 + on‑chain transfer" tech of stablecoins isn’t the deepest moat; the real moat lies in trust, regulation, liquidity, distribution, integration, use‑cases and economic incentives. Now the wolf is coming, and everyone sees another possible outcome. So I think a representative takeaway is: A single technology isn’t a moat; the ability to turn it into an irreplaceable product and profit stream for customers is the moat. I’ve discussed this theme many times with friends, why Buffett…