The Luna comparisons are cute but structurally incorrect.\n\nWhereas Luna was able to print tokens within the treasury without there being native demand as they did not sell any open market, the only way MSTR can issue more shares and sell them is if there’s a bidder.\n\nSTRC is also discretionary yield, allows Saylor to control his capital structure better.\n\n(There was for 8+ years now).
المكافأة
Terra بيانات الأسعار المباشرة
سعر اليوم لـ Terra هو $ 0.055 (LUNA/USD). بقيمة سوقية تبلغ $ 39.26M USD. حجم التداول خلال 24 ساعة لـ $ 81,392.15 USD، تغير السعر خلال 24 ساعة بمقدار +0.91%، وإمداد متداول قدره 709.98M LUNA.
Terra LUNA سجل الأسعار USD
تتبع سعر Terra لليوم، و7 أيام، و30 يومًا، و90 يومًا
الفترة
تغير
التغير (%)
اليوم
$ 0.00049
0.91%
7أيام
$ 0.00029
0.55%
30أيام
$ 0.0077
-12.38%
90أيام
$ 0.041
-42.68%
امتلك LUNA الآن
اشترِ وبع LUNA بسهولة وأمان على BitMart.
Terra معلومات السوق
$ 0.054 مدى 24سا $ 0.055
أعلى مستوى على الإطلاق
$ 17.00
أدنى مستوى على الإطلاق
$ 0.037
تغير24سا
0.91%
حجم 24سا
$ 81,392.15
الإمداد المتداول
0.71B
LUNA
القيمة السوقية
$ 39.26M
الحد الأقصى للإمداد
--
القيمة السوقية المخففة بالكامل
$ 65.62M
التداول LUNA
Terra رؤى X
FarmerJoe 🌎☮️
Trader
DeFi_Expert
B
37.3K @FarmerJoe0x هابط بشدة
STRC's returns rely on issuing more MSTR shares, posing significant structural risk.
Sisyphus D
153.3K @0xSisyphus The cash yield he pays out to holders of STRC is being paid for by new issuance of MSTR and STRC, in other words he is dumping shares to pay dividends and buy BTC.\n\nSTRC is still relatively small (about $5 billion of issuance), UST got to 4x this size before collapse.
4
0
618
2026-04-06 18:12
اتجاه LUNA بعد الإصدار
هابط
STRC's returns rely on issuing more MSTR shares, posing significant structural risk.
Jamal Damani
Educator
Influencer
B
3.2K @GenYusuf21 هابط
Terra Luna's $40B collapse warned of the danger of marketing outpacing fundamentals.
Terra Luna was a $40B lesson in what happens when marketing outpaces fundamentals.
May 2022.
$40 billion.
Gone in 72 hours.
Everyone blamed the algorithm.
I blame the narrative. https://t.co/FuqjZUYnTb
Jamal Damani
Educator
Influencer
B
3.2K @GenYusuf21 Terra’s marketing told one story, repeatedly, at scale:
“20% stable yield. Forever.”
That promise was the product.
Not the technology.
Not the team.
Not the chain.
The promise.
And when the promise broke, there was nothing underneath it.
Jamal Damani
Educator
Influencer
B
3.2K @GenYusuf21 Marketing didn’t fail Terra.
Marketing succeeded too well.
It built a trust architecture so convincing it shielded the fragility for years.
That’s not a marketing win.
That’s marketing as a weapon pointed at your own users.
Jamal Damani
Educator
Influencer
B
3.2K @GenYusuf21 They built the brand to protect the product.
The product destroyed the brand.
And took $40B of real people’s real money with it.
Retail investors in Nigeria. Philippines. Turkey.
People who believed the promise because the marketing was that good.
Jamal Damani
Educator
Influencer
B
3.2K @GenYusuf21 What should have existed underneath the narrative:
— A product that could sustain the promise without infinite new entrants
— Communication that explained risk, not just reward
— A team willing to say “this has limits” before the market said it for them
Jamal Damani
Educator
Influencer
B
3.2K @GenYusuf21 Marketing amplifies outcomes.
Good and bad.
The lesson isn’t “don’t market boldly.”
It’s this:
Build what you market.
Market what you’ve actually built.
The gap between those two sentences is where every major Web3 collapse lives.
Terra just had the biggest gap.
Discern
2
1
37
2026-04-06 17:17
اتجاه LUNA بعد الإصدار
هابط بشدة
Terra Luna's $40B collapse warned of the danger of marketing outpacing fundamentals.
Tanaka
DeFi_Expert
FA_Analyst
B
46.8K @Tanaka_L2 هابط
DeFi protocols carry significant security risks; users should be vigilant about potential fund losses and diversify their investments.
GM,
I spent some time earlier this week revisiting major crypto exploits, especially in DeFi.
And one thing I have to admit: no protocol is truly 100% safe. If the risk isn’t in the smart contract, it will be in the people, or in the system design itself.
Looking back at some major cases:
– @terra_money (LUNA) → not a hack, but flawed design still wiped out ~$60B.
– @Ronin_Network → validator compromised, ~$625M lost
– @wormhole → contract bug, ~$320M lost.
– @DriftProtocol → no smart contract hack, but governance/admin key compromise (social engineering + 2/5 multisig), ~$285M lost.
→ Different causes, same outcome: we are the ones losing money.
If you’re using DeFi for yield, lending, or trading perps:
– Never put all your capital into a single protocol.
– always split your capital across multiple platforms.
– don’t fully trust something just because it “looks hard to exploit”.
– always assume the worst case = 100% loss.
DeFi gives you a lot of opportunities, but it’s also the fastest place to lose money. Earning capital is hard, so protecting it matters even more.
happy new week.
100
33
7.3K
2026-04-06 04:42
اتجاه LUNA بعد الإصدار
هابط بشدة
DeFi protocols carry significant security risks; users should be vigilant about potential fund losses and diversify their investments.
حول Terra
Terra (LUNA) is a cryptocurrency launched in 2022. Terra has a current supply of 1,186,707,049 with 709,984,438.91686 in circulation. The last known price of Terra is 0.05545063 USD and is up 1.47 over the last 24 hours. It is currently trading on 223 active market(s) with $9,484,498.25 traded over the last 24 hours. More information can be found at https://terra.money/.
اقرأ المزيد
الروابط الرسمية
مستكشف السلاسل
شراء LUNA
التداول LUNA