Curve DAO Token (CRV)

$CRV front-ran our key swing low by a hair and has since been banging on that local supply/resistance in red (which is also the base from our triple tap that we need to reclaim to shift LTF bullish). If we keep the pressure on we may be able to clear it... https://t.co/fU542SPaMP

if we go a bit lower, I have to decide whether to pull the trigger on some more $CRV or $CVX. So lately, I've been asking myself the same question. It's a question I get a few times a week, minimum. Next week I'll be publishing a new article that finally answers the question that I get asked so frequently: "Should I buy $CRV or $CVX here?" Stay tuned...

DEXs spot volume is now at 2024 sept levels The low level energy is industry-wise right now The one building what's important now are gonna be the winners of the next cycle 🧠 https://t.co/PR8WL5jPrj

$CRV 💰

For those of you who recall the LTF "triple tap" we called and tracked on $XRP in January, we are seeing the exact same structure playing out here on $CRV now. The main difference is that the CRV structure has formed a triple tap local "top" whereas the XRP structure was a triple tap local "bottom" (keep reading or else you're going to misunderstand what I'm saying here). You can read the two options I laid out in the quoted tweet to understand the two distinct possibilities here. In XRP's case, we ended up following "Option 1" which meant that after we hit the first target of the triple tap (other side of the range) we fully reversed. The triple tap served as a temporary counter-trend "liq grab" before a reversal. If this is the same thing we are seeing on CRV now, then the target for the triple tap has already been met and we would be looking for a break back ABOVE the red zone, for a full on reversal. Alternatively, the triple tap can serve as a "base" before continued expansion. This is Option 2, w

A good read. Shows yet again that in order for ve / ve33 mechanics to work, there needs to be consistent volume within the protocol itself, token demand and holder/locker max alignment from the protocol (in terms of revenue payouts, of which @AerodromeFi wins out of the list mentioned in the article). Looking for many liquidity-dependent protocols to align oneself with during a macro backdrop of lowering global liquidity does not lead one to success. Hence why sticking with the winners and those with survivability is the only way to make it. $CRV $CVX $AERO