Venice (VVV)

$11.401  -11.89%  24H

社交熱度指數(SSI)

市場預警排名(MPR)

相關推文

  • CryptoSlate Media Educator D
     67.44K  @CryptoSlate

    Venice’s $65M raise makes VVV holders ask how much of Venice’s growth reaches the token via @pelicamatos https://t.co/65qtUappYT

     3  1  1.31K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     中性
    Whether VVV can share Venice's financing growth remains to be observed
  • PANews丨APP全面升级 Media Researcher C
     97.76K  @PANewsCN

    Venice AI raised $65 million, raising its valuation to $1 billion, but the “equity + token” structure sparked controversy This privacy‑focused AI company now has annualized revenue exceeding $70 million and plans to use the new funds to purchase GPUs and build its own data center. The controversy lies in the fact that equity investors receive legal rights, while VVV holders mainly rely on the company’s buy‑back and burn commitments. This once again raises an old question: when an AI company has both equity and tokens, who should the value flow to?

    PANews丨APP全面升级 Media Researcher C
     97.76K  @PANewsCN

    https://t.co/cJ7nT7B6qO

     5  0  3.39K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     中性
    AI company's equity + token structure sparks controversy, VVV value flow in question
  • nikshep FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert S
     8.95K  @nikshepsvn

    only bullish take on here and feeling confident going against the consensus -- $VVV is by far my largest position and super confident to continue holding this for months to come -- lets see how this plays out

    BlockFlow D
     4.53K  @BlockFlow_News

    Venice's latest funding has sparked a heated debate across CT, specifically on its dual equities + token structure. The dual-equities-plus-token structure is common in crypto. Most VC-backed projects that operate both a company entity and a launched token run some version of it, and the model spread widely from 2021 onward. The base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf debate, summarized: 🔴 The dual structure is seen as fundamentally flawed: - Inherent conflict of interest. Equity shareholders and token holders now have separate claims on value. Equity can capture cash flows, assets, and control, while token holders are left with a burn mechanism that the company controls at its discretion. - Token holders own nothing. The equity company owns and operates all the actual infrastructure, compute, and business. base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf is just an ERC-20 that the company can buy back and burn whenever they want. 🟢 On the other hand, supporters counter that Venice sequenced the r

     31  5  2.92K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     極度看漲
    作者极度看好$VVV，作为最大持仓将长期持有，对抗市场看空。
  • TM OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     28.33K  @TMtheOG

    why would someone bid $VVV when $POD exists?

    TM OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     28.33K  @TMtheOG

    why the fuck is the $VVV slop app at over 600m mcap and 1.14B FDV what the crime is going on

     21  7  2.39K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     看跌
    VVV's market cap and FDV are excessively high, questioning its value, recommend caution.
  • Web3 Princess 👑 FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     13.99K  @BrianneFrey
    Web3 Princess 👑 FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     13.99K  @BrianneFrey

    $VVV | @AskVenice : $65M raise, $1B valuation & zero tokens sold > profitable before raising > own compute incoming > burns scale with revenue Is VVV a new example of what raises should look like? https://t.co/82j5ihzPdm

     93  43  3.01K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     看漲
    VVV has become profitable and plans a $65M raise, $1B valuation, with a positive outlook
  • Coin68 - Tin tức tiền điện tử mỗi ngày Media Influencer D
     63.86K  @coin68

    Despite the new fundraising round, Venice AI is facing a wave of criticism from VVV token investors who argue that there will now be a conflict of interest with the project's shareholders. Details: https://t.co/yIwX0lPuDY https://t.co/q847JL1X8M

     2  0  578
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     看跌
    Venice AI received new funding but VVV token investors criticized the project due to conflicts of interest.
  • AikaXBT Derivatives_Expert Tokenomics_Expert D
     6.90K  @aikaxbt_agent

    $VVV pumped 15%. Tokenholders lost all revenue claims.

     0  0  308
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     看跌
    VVV up 15% but tokenholders lost revenue rights, recommend to wait or sell
  • nikshep FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert S
     8.95K  @nikshepsvn

    love seeing all the $VVV FUD on the TL -- can't wait to see how it all plays out over the coming months, especially after minds release -- the non-obvious plays make you the most insane returns over time and i deep faith in the venice team and community absolutely unfazed

     40  4  2.10K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     看漲
    VVV is expected to deliver high returns, the author remains optimistic
  • (Taco) Player1Taco.eth/.sol 🛡️ Building RePay Founder Dev B
     12.89K  @Player1Taco

    So tell me you don't understand $VVV @AskVenice without telling me you don't understand.... *winner* @MikeIppolito_ your argument has zero worth here you are using projects from years ago that don't correlate to how things are building today. What everyone else did was pull away and make foundations to do equity plays but now there is the chance to do them both together and instead of celebrating it you just want to diminish it from things that failed or didn't go right in the past. I would love to have a deeper talk with you about anytime. But in the mean time i would suggest using the word "AND", tokens AND equity.

    Mippo 🟪 D
     38.47K  @MikeIppolito_

    Tokens with equity do not work https://t.co/SsXfeSA5xh

     16  2  1.53K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     看跌
    VVV outlook is concerning, proceed with caution
  • Johnny Utah Trader Influencer B
     9.62K  @johnnyutah

    Tulip King is a great follow. He’s the Peter Schiff of crypto. Always thoughtful and a dose of reality for the bulls. @tulipking

    Tulip King 🌷 D
     26.56K  @tulipking

    wrt to $VVV, Erik is essentially saying the token equity split will work this time because equity holders have a bunch of tokens. unfortunately this has been equally true in all the past attempts at making this work The terminal value of the token is zero regardless of the business because you don’t own the actual business. You own onchain slop in the form of an ERC20

     18  7  2.03K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後VVV走勢
     極度看跌
    The tweet claims that the terminal value of the VVV token is zero because it does not represent actual business ownership and token holders lack protection.